TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jean Murrell Capers v. Cuyahoga County Board of Election

Jean Murrell CAPERS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION, Defendant-Appellant

Capers v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Election, 472 F.2d 1225 (6th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 17, 1973
Docket
No. 72-1429
Judges
Weick, Edwards, Mc-Cree
Citations
472 F.2d 122571 Ohio Op. 2d 1631973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12128

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In this case, fallowing a successful suit by plaintiff Capers against the Cuyahoga County Board of Election resulting in a District Court order requiring the Cuya-hoga County Board of Election to make provisions for the filing of the petitions allowing candidates independent of major parties to become candidates for mayor of the City of Cleveland in the 1971 mayoralty election, the District Judge found that the Board of Election’s overturned action was taken in “bad faith” and awarded attorney’s fees to the prevailing attorney in the sum of $2,160.

We indulge no speculation as to what in fact might have been the motivation of the decision of the Board of Election; all we can take into account on this appeal is the record in this case. On that record the District Judge’s finding of “bad faith” is not supported, and as a consequence, must be held to be clearly erroneous.

The record in this case does not warrant a conclusion that the defendant’s conduct was such willful and obdurate defiance of law as to warrant the award of attorney’s fees here appealed from.

The judgment of the District Court is reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. J. B. Taylor v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent503 F.2d 899 (6th Cir. 1974)

Most recent

  1. J. B. Taylor v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent503 F.2d 899 (6th Cir. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list