TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local No. 8, Waterway Terminals Company

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S AND WAREHOUSEMEN’S UNION LOCAL NO. 8, Respondent, Waterway Terminals Company, Intervenor

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union Local No. 8, Waterway Terminals Co., 473 F.2d 15 (9th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 30, 1973
Docket
No. 71-2898
Judges
Koelsch, Wright, Neill
Citations
473 F.2d 1582 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 26861973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11958

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order finding that International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union Local No. 8 (Local 8) picketed the premises of Waterway Terminals Company (Waterway) with an object of securing recognition, in violation of § 8(b)(7)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board’s decision and order, requiring that Local 8 cease and desist from further picketing, are reported at 193 NLRB No. 65 .' The underlying dispute between these parties has been before this court in another context. Waterway Terminals Co. v. N. L. É. B., 467 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1972).

The issue before the Board revolved around conflicting versions of what transpired at a meeting between representatives of Local 8 and Waterway on November 2, 1970. Local 8 excepted before the Board and now before us to the credibility resolutions made by the Trial Examiner. We do not disturb credibility resolutions “unless a clear preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces that they are incorrect.” N. L. R. B. v. Luisi Truck Lines, 384 F. 2d 842, 846 (9th Cir. 1967). We have carefully examined the record and have found no reason to reverse the credibility findings.

The petition for enforcement is granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11979: 319742026peak 1979 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Luisi Truck Lines, 384 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1967) 26
Waterway Terminals Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 467 F.2d 1011 (9th Cir. 1972) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list