TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vincent J. Bernabei v. United States

Vincent J. BERNABEI, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee

Bernabei v. United States, 473 F.2d 1385 (6th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 28, 1973
Docket
No. 72-1866
Judges
Edwards, Peck, Per Curiam, Wilson
Citations
473 F.2d 138531 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, who is an attorney, perfected this appeal from his conviction for failure to file federal income tax returns for the years 1965 through 1968. On this appeal appellant contends principally that the trial judge erred in refusing to permit him to introduce evidence of marital and financial difficulties, as to which proffers were made. It is his contention that in failing to file the returns in question he “had no evil motive . . . , but due to pressures and stress, neglected, without any criminal intent, to file his returns when due.” It is here concluded that evidence of financial and domestic problems are not relevant to the issue of wilfulness as the term is used in the statute under which appellant was charged and in the indictment, and that the evidence was properly excluded.

It is further concluded that the other contentions presented on appeal are without merit, and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 11985: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. James W. Greenlee517 F.2d 899 (3d Cir. 1975)
  2. United States v. Chris E. Sempos772 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Chris E. Sempos772 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)
  2. United States v. James W. Greenlee517 F.2d 899 (3d Cir. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list