TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Thomas Scott Delong v. United States

Thomas Scott DeLONG, Et Al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee

Delong v. United States, 474 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 5, 1973
Docket
No. 72-3494
Judges
Thornberry, Goldberg, Roney
Citations
474 F.2d 7191973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11321

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Appellants are presently serving three-year federal sentences imposed pursuant to convictions on guilty pleas for violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312 . Shortly after they were arrested for this violation in Texas, the appellants waived removal hearings and were delivered into the custody of a United States Marshal for the Western District of Oklahoma pursuant to a complaint pending in that district which also charged a Dyer Act violation. After assuming custody of the appellants in Oklahoma, the federal officers delivered them to Oklahoma state officials for prosecution on a state charge, without requiring the issuance of a writ of ha-beas corpus ad prosequendum. After they had served their Oklahoma state sentences, appellants were returned to federal custody in the Northern District of Texas, and were convicted of the Dyer Act offense.

In the court below, appellants sought relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , contending that the federal officials’ failure to require the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum before surrendering custody to Oklahoma state officials deprived the court below of jurisdiction to try them for the Dyer Act offense. The court below denied relief, and we affirm. It is settled that where one sovereign surrenders a prisoner to another sovereign for trial, sentencing, and execution of the sentence before he is to be returned to the custody of the sovereign first having jurisdiction, the prisoner has no standing to attack the agreement between sovereigns and the surrendering sovereign has not thereby waived its right to have the prisoner returned to its custody for trial. Bullock v. Mississippi, 5th Cir. 1968, 404 F.2d 75 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 21992: 12018: 119732026peak 1973 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bullock v. State of Miss., Joe Patterson, Attorney Gen., State Bd. of Parole, 404 F.2d 75 (5th Cir. 1968) 28

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list