R. L. Renken v. Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated)
R. L. RENKEN Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HARVEY ALUMINUM (INCORPORATED), Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, confirming the arbitrator’s award for the plaintiffs, after the entry of a consent decree. Error is charged against the District Court’s Order confirming the award, made on June 14, 1972, in two respects: (a) respondent’s alleged error in failure to give adequate notice; and (b) an alleged fraud in presentation of an earlier claim by a respondent.
We find no merit in this appeal, and we find it a frivolous appeal. Rule 38, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
*767 While the factual basis is not as flagrant as that in Lowe v. Willacy, 239 F.2d 179 (9th Cir. 1956), and Furbee v. Vantage Press, Inc., 150 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 464 F.2d 835, 837-838 (1972), we hold a penalty is proper against appellant.
The District Court’s Order is affirmed and the case is remanded to the District Court for the assessment of double costs to the appellees.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- William H. And Avilda L. Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lucy Ellen Candy Division of F & F Laboratories, Inc.
- Sandra S. Thompson v. Tega-Rand International, Albert Denola, Dba the Box Factory, and Runner's World Magazine Company, Inc.
- United States v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.
Most recent
- Sandra S. Thompson v. Tega-Rand International, Albert Denola, Dba the Box Factory, and Runner's World Magazine Company, Inc.
- William H. And Avilda L. Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- United States v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lucy Ellen Candy Division of F & F Laboratories, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.