TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bertie's Apple Valley Farms, an Idaho Corporation v. United States of America

BERTIE’S APPLE VALLEY FARMS, an Idaho Corporation, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Bertie's Apple Valley Farms, an Idaho Corp. v. United States, 476 F.2d 291 (9th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 29, 1973
Docket
No. 72-2741
Judges
Merrill, Ely, Wright
Citations
476 F.2d 291

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs sued in state court to quiet title to real and personal property. The government successfully petitioned under 28 U.S.C. § 1444 to remove to the district court where the action was dismissed.

The district court dismissed this action as one against the United States to which it had not consented. The United States is immune from suit except where it consents. United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 767 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941). Plaintiff contends that Congress has given its consent to suit in this case in 28 U.S.C. § 2410 , which provides in relevant part:

“ . . . the United States may be named a party in any civil action or suit in any district court, or in any State court having jurisdiction of the subject matter (1) to quiet title to . real or personal property on which the United States has or claims a mortgage or other lien.”

The United States does not claim a mortgage or other lien interest in the property involved herein. Rather, the United States claims title to the property, pursuant to an order of the Referee in Bankruptcy for the District of Idaho, who confirmed a sale by the trustee to the Small Business Administration. Congress in § 2410 did not consent to suits against the United States where the United States claims a title interest as distinguished from a lien interest.

See Wells v. Long, 68 F.Supp. 671 (D.Idaho 1946) aff’d on other grounds, 162 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1947).

The order of the district court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1978: 11980: 21981: 31992: 21994: 11998: 12001: 12005: 12007: 119782026peak 1981 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hughes v. United States953 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1992)
  2. Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States492 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2007)
  3. Bank of Hemet v. United States643 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1981)
  4. Koehler v. USA153 F.3d 263 (5th Cir. 1998)
  5. David M. Cummings v. United States of America and Colonel James M. Sigler648 F.2d 289 (5th Cir. 1981)
  6. Watson v. Chessman362 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (S.D. Cal. 2005)

Most recent

  1. Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United States492 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2007)
  2. Watson v. Chessman362 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (S.D. Cal. 2005)
  3. Kimberly Associates, an Idaho Limited Partnership v. United States261 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2001)
  4. Koehler v. USA153 F.3d 263 (5th Cir. 1998)
  5. Felkel v. United States861 F. Supp. 507 (D.S.C. 1994)
  6. Richard C. Hughes Joan C. Hughes v. United States of America Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Richard C953 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (1941) 3,523
Wells v. Long, 162 F.2d 842 (9th Cir. 1947) 45
Wells v. Long, 68 F. Supp. 671 (D. Idaho 1946) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list