TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Abraham Joseph Neal Rhodes, Who Now Uses the Name Abraham J. Rosenberg v. Bureau of Prisons

Abraham Joseph Neal RHODES, Who Now Uses the Name Abraham J. Rosenberg, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF PRISONS Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Abraham Joseph Neal Rhodes, Who Now Uses the Name Abraham J. Rosenberg v. Bureau of Prisons, 477 F.2d 347 (5th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 27, 1973
Docket
No. 72-3419
Judges
Bell, Godbold, In-Graham, Per Curiam
Citations
477 F.2d 3471973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10245

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking injunctive relief and damages. We affirm, but for reasons somewhat different from those assigned below.

Appellant, a prisoner incarcerated in the Federal Correctional Institution at Texarkana, Texas, filed his complaint in the United States District-Court for the District of Columbia. He sought an injunction against the Bureau of Prisons and the warden at Texarkana, in connection with their alleged interference with his mail and his right to communicate with the courts. The case was transferred on motion of respondents to the court from whence this appeal was taken. Prior to the order of transfer, the appellant had notified the court of his transfer from Texarkana to Eglin Air Force Base. After the order of transfer he filed in the transferor court an amended complaint seeking $25,000 damages from each named respondent. This amendment is a part of the record which was transmitted with the case to the transferee court. The case was then dismissed.

We agree that the claim for injunctive relief was rendered moot by appellant’s transfer out of the district. See Russell v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 1138 . However, the fact that appellant is no longer confined in the district does not affect his standing to seek damages in connection with the alleged wrongdoings. Culp v. Martin, 5 Cir. 1973, 471 F.2d 814 . Nevertheless, standing is of no avail to appellant. Although the district court erroneously dismissed the damage claim as moot, we do not deem it necessary to remand the case for further proceedings since, as a matter of law, appellant has failed to present any legal basis upon which he could recover under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . See Roots v. Callahan, 5 Cir., 1973, 475 F.2d 751 [No. 72-3589, March 20, 1973]; Norton v. McShane, 5 Cir. 1964, 332 F.2d 855, 862 ; Bethea v. Reid, 3 Cir. 1971, 445 F.2d 1163, 1164 ; Williams v. Rogers, 8 Cir. 1971, 449 F.2d 513, 517 .

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 11981: 21982: 21983: 11991: 21992: 12021: 119752026peak 1981 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 6

DepthCaseCited by
Norton v. McShane, 332 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1964) 162
Bethea v. Reid, 445 F.2d 1163 (3d Cir. 1971) 79
Williams v. Rogers, 449 F.2d 513 (8th Cir. 1971) 48
Roots v. J. A. Callahan, Inspector in Charge of Post Office Dep't, 475 F.2d 751 (5th Cir. 1973) 10
Culp v. Martin, 471 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1973) 8
Russell v. J. D. Henderson, 475 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir. 1973) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list