TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Helen Mascuilli, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Mascuilli, Deceased v. United States

Helen MASCUILLI, Administratrix of the Estate of Albert Mascuilli, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America

Mascuilli v. United States, 483 F.2d 81 (3d Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 31, 1973
Docket
No. 72-1615
Judges
Kalodner, Aldisert, Adams
Citations
483 F.2d 811973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8534

Opinion — Per Curiam

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:

The instant appeal arises out of the death of a longshoreman on May 1, 1959 while employed on the USNS Marine Fiddler in the Port of Philadelphia.

We remanded the case for a new hearing and determination of the issue of damages some four years ago when it came before us for the third time. In doing so we directed the district court to *82 compute earnings of the deceased longshoreman and to “employ when applicable and relevant the actual figures rather than estimates.” Mascuilli v. United States, 411 F.2d 867, 873-874 (1969).

The district court, 343 F.Supp. 439 , in calculating loss of earnings used “estimates” instead of “actual” figures, despite the fact that salary figures for longshoremen from the date of death to the date of hearing were adduced in evidence. In doing so it disrgearded our explicit directions.

For the reason stated the judgment of the district court will be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to proceed forthwith in accordance with our stated prior instructions to use actual figures, and not estimates, in calculating loss of earnings.

We deem without merit other contentions advanced by the appellant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 21975: 11976: 11978: 11980: 11994: 119742026peak 1974 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Arthur H. Barbe, Admr. v. David N. Drummond, David N. Drummond507 F.2d 794 (1st Cir. 1974)
  2. Mascuilli v. United States383 F. Supp. 50 (E.D. Pa. 1974)
  3. In re Adventure Bound Sports, Inc.858 F. Supp. 1192 (S.D. Ga. 1994)
  4. Smith v. United States587 F.2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1978)
  5. Solomon v. Warren540 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1976)
  6. Malgren v. United States390 F. Supp. 154 (W.D. Mich. 1975)

Most recent

  1. In re Adventure Bound Sports, Inc.858 F. Supp. 1192 (S.D. Ga. 1994)
  2. Richardson ex rel. Wiseman v. O'Brien17 V.I. 402 (D.V.I. 1980)
  3. Smith v. United States587 F.2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1978)
  4. Solomon v. Warren540 F.2d 777 (5th Cir. 1976)
  5. Malgren v. United States390 F. Supp. 154 (W.D. Mich. 1975)
  6. Arthur H. Barbe, Admr. v. David N. Drummond, David N. Drummond507 F.2d 794 (1st Cir. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Mascuilli v. United States, 343 F. Supp. 439 (E.D. Pa. 1972) 14
Mascuilli v. United States, 411 F.2d 867 (3d Cir. 1969) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list