Luther B. Jackson v. Terry Hensley
Luther B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry HENSLEY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM:
It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant’s failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules.
1
Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1297 .
1
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.