TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Southeastern Michigan Gas Co.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN GAS CO., Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southeastern Mich. Gas Co., 485 F.2d 1239 (6th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 19, 1973
Docket
No. 17-6037
Judges
Edwards, Celebrezze, McCree
Citations
485 F.2d 123985 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 21911973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7442

Opinion

ORDER This case is before us upon the application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board that is reported at 198 N.L.R.B. No. 8.

The Board, adopting the findings and recommendations of the trial examiner, determined that the company violated §§ 8(a)(5) & (1) of the Act by discontinuing work performance reviews and the wage increase policy and discontinuing the providing of new boots for meter readers without notice to or consultation with the union certified as the exclusive bargaining representative of the unit employees. The Board ordered the company to cease and desist from the unfair labor practices found, to resume the policies and practices unilaterally discontinued, to make all employees in the unit whole for wage increases and for any losses suffered by reason of discontinuance of the boot purchase policy and to post appropriate notices.

A review of the record convinces us that the findings of fact of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole and that the unfair labor practices occurred after June 23, 1971 within the jurisdictional six-month period prior to the filing of the unfair labor practice charge as provided by § 10(b) of the Act. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the order of the Board be enforced.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11980: 11999: 319772026peak 1999 · 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list