TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gladys S. Randolph v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary

Gladys S. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elliott L. RICHARDSON, Secretary, Defendant-Appellee

Randolph v. Richardson, 486 F.2d 1046 (6th Cir. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 6, 1973
Docket
No. 73-1453
Judges
Peck, McCree, Allen
Citations
486 F.2d 10461973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7181

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment affirming the Secretary’s denial of a claim for disabled widow’s insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 402 (e). This provision authorizes the award of benefits to a widow of a fully insured individual if she is unmarried and has attained age 50, but has not attained age 60, and is under a disability, as defined in § 423(d) of the Social Security Act. Benefits may be awarded within a period beginning with the month of the death of the wage earner and concluding with the close of the 84th month following the month when the period began.

Disability for this purpose is defined by regulations prescribed by the Secretary as a level of physical or mental impairment sufficient to preclude engaging in any gainful activity, and the Secretary has adopted regulations listing impairments preclusive of any gainful activity. The regulations also permit the award of benefits for an impairment that is the equivalent in severity and duration of a listed impairment. Social Security Administration Regulations, Chapter III, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1504 et seq.

Although it is apparent to us, as it was to the district court, that appellant experiences substantial physical impairment, nevertheless, the record affords substantial evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the Secretary, affirmed by the district court, that appellant’s impairment is not of a severity that meets or equals any described in the listing of impairments in the applicable regulations. The findings of the Secretary are made conclusive as to any fact if supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Rose v. Cohen, 406 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, noting that the period during which appellant may establish that she is under a disability as defined in the statute extends through June 30, 1974, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Rose v. Cohen, 406 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1969) 26

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list