TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Otis Minafee v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, No. 73-3391 Summary Calendar

Otis Minafee v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, No. 73-3391 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of N.Y., Citizens Casualty Company of New York Et

Minafee v. W. J. Estelle, Dir., Tex. Dep't of Corr., No. 73-3391 Summary Calendar, 491 F.2d 1096 (5th Cir. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 29, 1974
Docket
No. 1096
Citations
491 F.2d 1096

Opinion

491 F.2d 1096

Otis MINAFEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 73-3391 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y. et al., Citizens Casualty Company of New York et

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 29, 1974.

E. Eldridge Goins, Jr., Dallas, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The district court dismissed the habeas petition of Otis Minafee on the merits of all but one of the contentions raised. Finding that contention had not been exhausted in the state forum, it was dismissed without prejudice.

2

Although it recognized that the specific constitutional arguments in Minafee's petition had not been presented to the Texas courts, the district court found that the alleged errors asserted on Minafee's direct appeal in Texas had been predicated upon the same factual bases as his federal habeas contentions. This factual sameness will not support a holding that such constitutional assertions have been exhausted. See Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 277 , 92 S.Ct. 509, 513 , 30 L.Ed.2d 438, 444 (1971).

3

The cause is vacated and remanded with instructions to the district court to dismiss without prejudice as to all issues.

4

Vacated and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270 (1971) 5,038

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list