United States v. Robert Fonseca
Opinion
497 F.2d 1384
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert FONSECA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-2875.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 9, 1974.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; John H. Wood, Jr., Judge.
1
Joseph A. Calamia, John L. Fashing, El Paso, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
2
William Sessions, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Edward S. Marquez, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
3
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC 4
(Prior opinion 490 F.2d 464 .)
5
Before COLEMAN, AINSWORTH and GEE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
6
In view of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dorsynski v. United States, U.S. , 94 S.Ct. 3042 , 40 L.Ed.2d (1974) relative to the sentencing requirements to be met by the district court under subsection 5010(d) of the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. 5005, et seq., petitioner Fonseca's petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that the matter is remanded for resentencing under the guidelines of Dorsynski. In all other respects the petition is denied.
7
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rhearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.