12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 391, 21 Wage & Hour Cas. (Bn 948, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9623 Carol Ann Cupples v. Transport Insurance Company, and the Transport Management Company
Opinion
498 F.2d 1091 12 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 391 , 21 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 948, 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9623 Carol Ann CUPPLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, and the Transport Management Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-1854. Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 , Part I.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 1974.
Edward B. Cloutman, III, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
George W. Bramblett, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
Before COLEMAN, DYER and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
In an individual action, Mrs. Carol Ann Cupples sued her former employer, who had discharged her, charging that as a female she had been the victim of discrimination with respect to hiring, job classifications, and promotions, as well as terms and conditions of employment, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a) and (d); 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3; 29 U.S.C. 206(d)(1).
2
The district Court found for the employer, Cupples v. Transport Insurance Company, 371 F.Supp. 146 (1974). We affirm.
3
In suits alleging discrimination in employment practices as to identified individuals, findings of fact by district courts may be set aside only if unsupported by substantial evidence, Bolton v. Murray Envelope Corporation, 5 Cir., 1974, 493 F.2d 191 . In all aspects, this case was clearly of that type and the Bolton rule mandates an affirmance. In the evidentiary posture of the case, the same would have been true and the trial court held the other way. This leaves no room for appellate revision of the judgment below.
4
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(small number of females less probative in company of only 90 employees than in larger company)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.