TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, Etc.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SEQUOIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, Etc., Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sequoia Dist. Council of Carpenters, Etc., 499 F.2d 129 (9th Cir. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 7, 1974
Docket
No. 73-3365
Judges
Koelsch, Wright, Trask
Citations
499 F.2d 129

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) for enforcement of its order against Sequoia District Council of Carpenters, AFL-CIO (“the Union”). The Board’s decision and order are reported at 206 N.L. R.B. No. 8 (1973).

Based on our review of the record as a whole, the Board’s finding that the Union engaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended ( 29 U.S.C. § 158 (b)(4)), is supported by substantial evidence.

The Board may properly enter a broad order such as this one here if a Union has demonstrated a “proclivity” to violate the secondary boycott provisions of the Act. N. L. R. B. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 70, 490 F.2d 87, 88 (9th Cir. 1973); N. L. R. B. v. Local 85, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 454 F.2d 875, 879 (9th Cir. 1972). The record shows that this respondent has a history of similar violations, including one fully litigated decision (186 N. L. R. B. 432 (1970), enforced by this court in an unreported decision filed January 10, 1972), and settlement stipulations in two separate cases (Nos. 20-CC-1143, 1273). The prior settlement stipulations may be treated as equivalent to fully adjudicated decisions of the Board enforced by this court, in accordance with the terms of the stipulations.

The Board’s order will be enforced.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 11977: 11986: 11993: 119752026peak 1975 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 85, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., 454 F.2d 875 (9th Cir. 1972) 5
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bhd. Of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70, 490 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1973) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list