L. J. 'Lee' Folkins, Dba Standard Oil Distributors v. National Labor Relations Board
L. J. “Lee” FOLKINS, Dba Standard Oil Distributors, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Opinion
OPINION PER CURIAM:
L. J. Folkins petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding violation of Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order. The Board’s order is reported at 206 NLRB No. 35 .
Folkins is engaged in the distribution of petroleum products under contract with Standard Oil Company of California. On February 12, 1973, the company hired Richard Smith as a tank truck driver. That evening, Smith accompanied three of the company’s four other employees to a meeting with union representatives. Smith and two of the other employees ultimately signed union authorization cards. The next morning, February 13, 1973, union representatives visited Folkins and requested recognition. Folkins was non-committal and the union gave the company until the afternoon to respond to the request. That afternoon Folkins discharged Smith.
At the hearing, Folkins presented numerous business justifications for the discharge. However, the Administrative Law Judge and the Board rejected each of the alleged justifications as spurious and contradicted by the evidence.
The critical issue is a factual one, namely the actual motive for Smith’s discharge. In determining motive, the Board “may rely on circumstantial as well as direct evidence and its inference and finding must prevail where it is reasonable and supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.” Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 1951, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .
Circumstantial evidence, including the timing of Smith’s discharge, coupled with Folkins’ apparently fabricated business justifications, is sufficient to support the Board’s findings. See N. L. R. B. v. Council Manufacturing Corp., 8 Cir., 1964, 334 F.2d 161, 164 .
Folkins’ petition is denied.
The Order of the Board will be enforced.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- New Breed Leasing Corporation, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And
- National Labor Relations Board v. Inland Empire Meat Company
- Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
- Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
Most recent
- Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
- Healthcare Employees Union, Local 399 v. National Labor Relations Board
- New Breed Leasing Corporation, and v. National Labor Relations Board, And
- Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Inland Empire Meat Company
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.