TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Harman Victor Usher, No. 73-4022 Summary Calendar

United States v. Harman Victor Usher, No. 73-4022 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of N.Y. 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970)

United States v. Harman Victor Usher, No. 73-4022 Summary Calendar, 500 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 10, 1974
Docket
No. 388
Citations
500 F.2d 388

Opinion

500 F.2d 388

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harman Victor USHER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 73-4022 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N.Y. 431 F.2d 409 , Part I (5th Cir. 1970).

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 9, 1974, Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1974.

Edward C. Stone, Atlanta, Ga. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

William Schloth, U.S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Pursuant to this court's remand under United States v. Dover, 489 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1974), the district judge who sentenced the defendant has supplemented the record in this cause with the statement 'At the time I pronounced sentence in this case I determined and I now determine that the Defendant would not derive benefit from treatment under 18 U.S.C. 5010(b) (The Youth Correction Act).' This statement complies with the district court's duty under that act. Dorszynski v. United States, U.S. , 94 S.Ct. 3042 , 41 L.Ed.2d (1974).

2

Since Usher has never raised with the district court any question as to the propriety of his waiver of the right to be represented by counsel in that forum, we refuse to consider his contention to that effect on this appeal.

3

The judgment and commitment entered March 14, 1973 and the subsequent actions of the district court in this cause are 4

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1975: 219752026peak 1975 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Scheffer506 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1975)
  2. United States v. Daniel Mark Scheffer, No. 74-2101 Summary Calendar506 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1975)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Daniel Mark Scheffer, No. 74-2101 Summary Calendar506 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1975)
  2. United States v. Scheffer506 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Isbell Enters. v. Citizens Cas. Co, 431 F.2d 409 (3d Cir. 1970) 3,975
Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424 (1974) 532
United States v. Dover, 489 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1974) 5
United States v. Usher, 500 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1974) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list