Robert J. Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole and Walter Dunbar, Chairman
Robert J. SCARPA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U. S. BOARD OF PAROLE and Walter Dunbar, Chairman Et Al., Respondents-Appellees
Opinion
BY THE COURT:
The Supreme Court of the United States having vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded the cause to this Court for consideration of the question of mootness, 414 U.S. 809 , 94 S.Ct. 79 , 38 L.Ed.2d 44 , and appellant having filed a motion suggesting that this cause is now moot because appellant was granted a parole effective October 29, 1973.
On further consideration whereof, it is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court dated February 17, 1971 dismissing appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim is hereby vacated, and this cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to enter an order dismissing appellant’s complaint as moot.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(due process does not apply to parole hearings; questioned in United States ex rel. Johnson, supra)
Cited by 19 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Franklin v. Shields
- Sidney F. Brown, Jr. v. David C. Lundgren, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution
- Lynell Franklin, Charles Jones, Lawrence Wilson, and Charles R. Vette v. Pleasant C. Shields, Morris L. Ridley, W. K. Cunningham, Margaret Davis, N
- Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
- Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Board
- Charles R. Warren v. United States Parole Commission
Most recent
- Charles R. Warren v. United States Parole Commission
- Douglas Glynn Payton, Administrator of the Estate of Sheryl Lynn Payton, Deceased v. The United States of America
- Phillip Bruce Christopher v. U. S. Board of Parole
- William James Rummel v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections
- State ex rel. Taylor v. Schoen
- Inmates Of The Nebraska Penal And Correctional Complex v. Greenholtz
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.