TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Incorporated, Kyw-Tv v. National Labor Relations Board, and Directors Guild of America, Incorporated

WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, KYW-TV, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Directors Guild of America, Incorporated, Intervenor

Westinghouse Broad. Co., Inc., Kyw-Tv v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., & Directors Guild of Am., Inc., 503 F.2d 1055 (2d Cir. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 9, 1974
Docket
No. 123
Judges
Kaufman, Per Curiam, Smith, Timbers
Citations
503 F.2d 1055

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Westinghouse petitions for review of a determination by the National Labor Relations Board that it committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain collectively with the Directors Guild of America, the elected bargaining representative of the “producer-directors” at Westinghouse station KYW-TV in Philadelphia. The Board cross-petitions for an order of enforcement.

The only question presented for review is whether the producer-directors are excluded from the protection of the Act as “supervisors” or “managerial employees.” We find that the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. For reasons stated in the opinion of the Regional Director, Case No. 4-RC-10351 (July 23, 1973), it is evident that the employees in question are not “supervisors.”

See Post-Newsweek Stations, 203 N.L.R.B. No. 91, 83 LRRM 1081 (1973). Nor is there any ground to question the Regional Director’s finding that the producer-directors lack the discretion and responsibility required to mark them as “managerial employees.” Bell Aerospace Co. v. NLRB, 475 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1973), aff’d in relevant part, 416 U.S. 267 , 94 S.Ct. 1757 , 40 L.Ed.2d 134 (1974).

Petition for review dismissed. Cross-petition for order of enforcement granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1982: 11984: 11986: 11998: 119822026peak 1982 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co., 416 U.S. 267 (1974) 924
Bell Aerospace Co. Div. of Textron v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 475 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1973) 24

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list