TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Joe T. Barrera v. Roscoe, Snyder & Pacific Railway Company

Joe T. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROSCOE, SNYDER & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Barrera v. Roscoe, Snyder & Pac. Ry. Co., 503 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 8, 1974
Docket
No. 73-3731
Judges
Rives, Gewin, Goldberg
Citations
503 F.2d 1058

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We have given careful consideration to the contentions of the parties as set forth in their well-prepared briefs and further amplified at oral argument. It is our opinion that the district court arrived at the proper conclusion and that the appellant has not presented any valid basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment entered for appellee by the district court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11983: 11984: 11989: 12001: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Thate v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.595 S.W.2d 591 (Tex. App. 1980)
  2. Clarence Deshong v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation737 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir. 1984)
  3. Nichols v. Pabtex, Inc.151 F. Supp. 2d 772 (E.D. Tex. 2001)
  4. Hopgood v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.458 N.E.2d 525 (Ill. App. Ct. 1983)
  5. Smoot v. New York Susquehanna & Western Railway Corp.707 F. Supp. 629 (N.D.N.Y. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Nichols v. Pabtex, Inc.151 F. Supp. 2d 772 (E.D. Tex. 2001)
  2. Smoot v. New York Susquehanna & Western Railway Corp.707 F. Supp. 629 (N.D.N.Y. 1989)
  3. Clarence Deshong v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, a Corporation737 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir. 1984)
  4. Hopgood v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.458 N.E.2d 525 (Ill. App. Ct. 1983)
  5. Thate v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.595 S.W.2d 591 (Tex. App. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list