Marvin L. Dietrich and Marjorie Dietrich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Marvin L. DIETRICH and Marjorie Dietrich, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and oral argument, the Court has concluded that the factual findings of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous, that its decision is based upon a correct interpretation of the law as applied to the pleadings and the facts of the case, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.
See Leathers v. United States, 471 F.2d 856 (8th Cir. 1972); Wertzberger v. United States, 441 F.2d 1166 (8th Cir. 1971). For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed without opinion.
See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.