TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Windham v. Long

Windham v. Long.

Windham v. Long, 16 So. 2d 9 (Ala. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 16, 1943
Docket
No. 4 Div. 305.
Judges
Bouldin, Foster, Gardner, Stakely
Citations
16 So. 2d 9245 Ala. 227

Opinion of the Court

The assignments of error present no serious question for consideration on this appeal, except the excessive amount of the verdict.

We are impressed that the verdict is excessive, and under the authority of section 811, Title 7, Code of 1940, the amount of the verdict is hereby reduced to the sum of $300. If plaintiff remits all in excess of said sum by filing a remittitur with the clerk of this Court within thirty days, the judgment of the court below will stand affirmed, otherwise it will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Affirmed conditionally.

GARDNER, C. J., and BOULDIN and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Addendum — Per Curiam

Appellee having failed to file remittitur, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 119692026peak 1969 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ginn218 So. 2d 680 (Ala. 1969)

Most recent

  1. GENERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ginn218 So. 2d 680 (Ala. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list