Nichols v. Hardegree
Nichols v. Hardegree.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
McOLELLAN, j.
The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. ( 20 South. iv ); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank, 156 Ala. 666 , 46 South. 751 ; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co., 194 Ala. 175 , 69 South. 601 ; Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480 , 65 South. 397 ; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345 , 56 South. 809 ; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 South. 594 .
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS,' JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.