TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nichols v. Hardegree

Nichols v. Hardegree.

Nichols v. Hardegree, 79 So. 598 (Ala. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 27, 1918
Docket
No. 7 Div. 845.
Judges
McOlellan, Anderson, Mayfield, Thomas
Citations
79 So. 598202 Ala. 1321918 Ala. LEXIS 323
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Appeal and Error <&wkey;753(2) — Failure to Assign Errors — Affirmance — Rule of Court. Under Supreme Court Practice Rules, No. 1 (20 South; iv), appellant’s failure to assign any errors requires affirmance.
Summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge. Action between J. T. Nichols and R. M. Hardegree. From judgment for the latter, the former .appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — McOLELLAN

McOLELLAN, j.

The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. ( 20 South. iv ); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank, 156 Ala. 666 , 46 South. 751 ; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co., 194 Ala. 175 , 69 South. 601 ; Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480 , 65 South. 397 ; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345 , 56 South. 809 ; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 South. 594 .

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS,' JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1920: 11922: 11929: 21930: 11931: 11935: 11938: 11941: 11945: 11947: 11952: 11953: 11956: 11958: 11961: 21975: 119202026peak 1929 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Congress of Industrial Organizations v. McAdory325 U.S. 472 (1945)
  2. Wetzel v. Hobbs31 So. 2d 639 (Ala. 1947)
  3. Nostrand v. Little361 P.2d 551 (Wash. 1961)
  4. Dobson v. Deason61 So. 2d 764 (Ala. 1952)
  5. Redd Chemical & Nitrate Co. v. W. T. Clay Mercantile Co.122 So. 652 (Ala. 1929)
  6. Stidham v. Stidham86 So. 2d 294 (Ala. 1956)

Most recent

  1. Esters v. State308 So. 2d 742 (Ala. Crim. App. 1975)
  2. Hemphill v. State134 So. 2d 432 (Ala. Ct. App. 1961)
  3. Nostrand v. Little361 P.2d 551 (Wash. 1961)
  4. Crim v. Gilbert104 So. 2d 632 (Ala. 1958)
  5. Stidham v. Stidham86 So. 2d 294 (Ala. 1956)
  6. Hoyle v. Hill64 So. 2d 895 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co., 69 So. 601 (Ala. 1915) 69
Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R., 65 So. 397 (Ala. 1914) 43
Dickens v. Dickens, 56 So. 809 (Ala. 1911) 19
Chavers v. Mayo, 79 So. 594 (Ala. 1918) 28
Pettibone-Taylor Co. v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 156 Ala. 666 (1900) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list