TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Baxter v. State

Baxter v. State.

Baxter v. State, 115 So. 763 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 13, 1928
Docket
No. 7 Div. 391.
Judges
Bricken
Citations
115 So. 76322 Ala. App. 3601928 Ala. App. LEXIS 58

Opinion of the Court — Bricken

BRICKEN, P. J.

No questions are presented for review by this court. No exceptions were reserved. In the absence of some adverse ruling of the court to which an exception is duly reserved, this court is without authority to place the lower court in error, even if, as here insisted, the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment rendered. Woodson’s Case, 170 Ala. 87 , 54 So. 191 . The jurisdiction of this court in cases in the category of which this ease belongs is appellate only, and review here can only be had where ruling at nisi prius had been invoked.

In this case, however, we note that the evidence was in conflict, and one phase thereof appears to have justified the court in rendering its judgment of conviction for the violation of the prohibition law as charged in the complaint.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Woodson v. State, 54 So. 181 (Ala. 1910) 61

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list