TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sims v. State

Sims v. State.

Sims v. State, 75 So. 276 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 10, 1917
Docket
No. 8 Div. 428.
Judges
Samford
Citations
75 So. 27616 Ala. App. 701917 Ala. App. LEXIS 131
Disposition
Reversed and remanded.
Headnotes
1. Criminal Law <&wkey;3C9(5) — Evidence — Other Offenses. In prosecution for larceny, it was error to admit testimony that defendant had been prosecuted in federal courts for making' liquor. [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 822, 823.] 2. Witnesses <&wkey;344(4) — Impeachment. The making' of liquor does not constitute bad character to such an extent that a man who is charged with making it cannot be believed. [Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. §§ 1129, 1125.]
Summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County ; W. I-Iaralson, Judge. Joe Sims was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Samford

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of grand larceny, and from the judgment he appeals.

[1]

On the trial the state proved hy the witness Walls (transcript, p. 7), over the objection of the defendant, that the defendant had been prosecuted in the United States court for making liquor. Upon what possible theory the court permitted this evidence to go to the jury, we cannot conceive. The defendant was being tried for the larceny of an evaporator. There was no evidence to show he had ever used this evaporator for making liquor.

[2]

The making of liquor does not constitute bad character to such an extent that a man who is charged with making it cannot be believed; and in this instance it is not even claimed that he was convicted. For this error the judgment of the court must be reversed, and the other questions reserved will not probably arise on another trial.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list