TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bobby L. Forrest and Gerald E. Kiefer, D/B/A Forrest & Kiefer v. The Capital Buildings & Loan Assn.

Bobby L. FORREST and Gerald E. Kiefer, D/B/A Forrest & Kiefer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the CAPITAL BUILDINGS & LOAN ASSN. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Forrest v. The Capital Buildings & Loan Assn., 504 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 9, 1974
Docket
No. 74-1066
Judges
Tuttle, Roney, Gee
Citations
504 F.2d 8911974 U.S. App. LEXIS 5737

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Two lawyers challenge, as antitrust violations under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, the practice followed by each defendant savings and loan association in requiring its borrowers to pay the legal fees of attorneys selected by the savings and loan association to examine titles for it, render title opinions to it, and prepare the necessary security agreements, when lending its money.

Under plaintiffs’ theory such requirement constitutes a tying arrangement by which the attorneys’ services are tied to the extension of credit in restraint of free competition and the practice deprives the plaintiffs of law business.

We agree with the defendant associations that their procedures are in accordance with the basic and fundamental right of all persons to use counsel of their own choice and within the requirements of state and federal law. We agree with the district court’s determination that this method of doing business does not constitute a sale of two products or a violation of the tied product prohibition of the antitrust laws.

The facts of the case and the legal basis for summary judgment for the de *892 fendants are fully and sufficiently set forth in Judge James A. Comiskey’s opinion published at 385 F.Supp. 831 (E.D.La.1974).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 21978: 21979: 21980: 11981: 21983: 11985: 11990: 119772026peak 1977 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Forrest v. Capital Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 385 F. Supp. 831 (M.D. La. 1973) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list