TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Malone v. State

Malone v. State.

Malone v. State, 98 So. 915 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 22, 1924
Docket
No. 6 Div. 249.
Judges
Sameord
Citations
98 So. 91519 Ala. App. 5541924 Ala. App. LEXIS 19

Opinion of the Court — Sameord

SAMEORD, J.

The verdict of the jury, as shown by the minute entry, is: “We, the jury, find the defendant as charged in count 2 of the indictment.” This court, in Huckabaa v. State, 95 South. 587 , 1

was of the opinion that the verdict was sufficient upon which to base a judgment of guilt, but on certiorari the Supreme Court (Ex parte I-Iuckabaa, 209 Ala. 4 , 95 South. 42 ) held to the contrary, and perhaps correctly so. The latter opinion must govern, and for that error the judgment is reversed and the'cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

1

Ante, p. 11.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1949: 119492026peak 1949 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hunter v. State41 So. 2d 632 (Ala. Ct. App. 1949)

Most recent

  1. Hunter v. State41 So. 2d 632 (Ala. Ct. App. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Huckabaa, 95 So. 42 (Ala. 1922) 5
Huckabaa v. State, 95 So. 587 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list