TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bentley v. State

Bentley v. State.

Bentley v. State, 112 So. 810 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 12, 1927
Docket
No. 7 Div. 271.
Judges
Samford
Citations
112 So. 81022 Ala. App. 1011927 Ala. App. LEXIS 65

Opinion of the Court — Samford

SAMFORD, J.

The two charges refused by the court and insisted upon as error have been condemned by the Supreme Court in Edwards v. State, 205 Ala. 160 , 87 So. 179 .

There was no request for the general charge or motion for a new trial. We cannot therefore pass upon the insistence, made in appellant’s brief, that the defendant was entitled to his discharge on account of the insufficiency of the evidence.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 11948: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Little v. State39 So. 2d 587 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948)
  2. Williams v. State133 So. 736 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Little v. State39 So. 2d 587 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948)
  2. Williams v. State133 So. 736 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Edwards v. State, 87 So. 179 (Ala. 1920) 154

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list