TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

48th Street Fairfield Inv. v. Fairfield-Am. Nat. Bank

48TH STREET INV. CO. Et Al. v. FAIRFIELD-AMERICAN NAT. BANK

48th St. Fairfield Inv. v. Fairfield-Am. Nat. Bank, 134 So. 803 (Ala. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 14, 1931
Docket
No. 6 Div. 788.
Judges
Thomas, Anderson, Sayre, Brown
Citations
134 So. 803223 Ala. 441931 Ala. LEXIS 114

Opinion of the Court — Thomas

THOMAS, J.

The assignment of errors challenges the action of the trial court in holding the appellants’ plea to jurisdiction insufficient in law, overruling motion to dismiss the bill, and overruling the appellants’ demurrer to the bill.

*46 The hill was for discovery and accounting. First National Bank of LaPine v. Bradley, ante, p. 22, 134 So. 621 .

We will not consider on appeal ruling on interlocutory decree overruling the plea of venue or motion to dismiss, same not being within the provisions of the statute, and not final. Section 6079, Code, Acts 1915, p. 137; State v. Jabeles, 203 Ala. 670 , 85 So. 16 ; Worthington v. Morris, 212 Ala. 334 , 102 So. 620 ; Sugar Factories Const. Co. v. Fies, 213 Ala. 556 , 105 So. 590 .

After dissolution, the corporation existed under the statute for a period of five years for the purpose of prosecuting or defending suits, settling its business, disposing of its property, and dividing its capital stock, but not for the purpose of continuing its business. Section 7069, Code of 1928; Pankey v. Lippman, 187 Ala. 199 , 65 So. 771 ; Pearce v. Brilliant Coal Co., 200 Ala. 630 , 77 So. 4 .

In the capital stock and other property of a corporation, a trust relation is created for creditors and stockholders. Adams v. Perryman & Co., 202 Ala. 469 , 80 So. 853 ; Leyden v. Calhoun Co-operative Creamery Co., post, p. 289, 135 So. 317 .

A corporation or a natural person can be sued at the place of its or his residence or domicile, Section 10467, Code; Cairns v. Bethea, 211 Ala. 635 , 101 So. 587 ; Burg v. Smith (Ala. Sup.) 133 So. 687 ;

1

a bill must be filed in the county where the defendant or a material defendant resides, section 6524, Code; ' Burg v. Smith, supra. The bill avers that the defendant corporation resides at Fairfield, Jefferson county, Ala. The plea does not deny this; but merely avers a suspension of business. And the demurrer admits the allegation of residence when sued at its principal office, and place of business and domicile, or residence, Burg v. Smith, supra; Burch v. Ingham Lumber Co., 212 Ala. 204 , 102 So. 19 , and many authorities cited; 14 C. J. 338, § 416; and, where the bill shows on its face jurisdictional facts, venue cannot be challenged by demurrer, Campbell v. Crawford, 63 Ala. 392 ; Crawford v. Walter, 202 Ala. 235 , 80 So. 73 .

And a bill to require trustee directors of a corporation that has been dissolved to make discovery and accounting has equity. First National Bank of LaPine v. Bradley (Ala. Sup.) 134 So. 621 ;

2

Pankey v. Lippman, supra ; Wooten v. Steele, 109 Ala. 563 , 19 So. 972 , 55 Am. St. Rep. 947 .

Moreover, the bill shows that a part of the real property conveyed was. in Jefferson county (Davidson v. Brown, 215 Ala. 205 , 110 So. 384 ; Burg v. Smith, supra), and cancellation was sought of the conveyance of the Jefferson county lands. Stone v. Davenport Bros., 200 Ala. 396 , 76 So. 312 . The lands in question were in different counties, and, while the bill was filed in Jefferson county, it may have been properly filed in either county.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON; C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

1

222 Ala. 600 .

2

Ante, p. 22.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1931: 21933: 21934: 11938: 11940: 11941: 11946: 11952: 119312026peak 1931 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Boothton Coal Mining Co. v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.60 So. 2d 833 (Ala. 1952)
  2. Southeastern Const. Co. v. Robbins27 So. 2d 705 (Ala. 1946)
  3. Goodwyn v. Union Springs Guano Co.153 So. 246 (Ala. 1934)
  4. Taylor v. Morton151 So. 853 (Ala. 1933)
  5. Rochell v. Oates2 So. 2d 749 (Ala. 1941)
  6. Cohen v. Pavlik178 So. 435 (Ala. 1938)

Most recent

  1. Boothton Coal Mining Co. v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.60 So. 2d 833 (Ala. 1952)
  2. Southeastern Const. Co. v. Robbins27 So. 2d 705 (Ala. 1946)
  3. Rochell v. Oates2 So. 2d 749 (Ala. 1941)
  4. Walter T. Weaver Co. v. Longshore199 So. 485 (Ala. 1940)
  5. Cohen v. Pavlik178 So. 435 (Ala. 1938)
  6. Goodwyn v. Union Springs Guano Co.153 So. 246 (Ala. 1934)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 16

DepthCaseCited by
Burg v. Smith, 133 So. 687 (Ala. 1931) 6
Pankey v. Lippman, 65 So. 771 (Ala. 1914) 11
Davidson v. Brown, 110 So. 384 (Ala. 1926) 23
First Nat. Bank of La Pine v. Bradley, 134 So. 621 (Ala. 1931) 14
Adams v. Perryman & Co., 80 So. 853 (Ala. 1919) 14
Worthington v. Morris, 102 So. 620 (Ala. 1925) 11
Pearce v. Brilliant Coal Co., 77 So. 4 (Ala. 1917) 8
Crawford v. Walter, 80 So. 73 (Ala. 1918) 8
Sugar Factories Const. Co. v. Fies, 105 So. 590 (Ala. 1925) 8
State v. Jabeles, 85 So. 16 (Ala. 1920) 8
Stone v. Davenport Bros., 76 So. 312 (Ala. 1917) 6
Burch v. Ingham Lumber Co., 102 So. 19 (Ala. 1924) 3
Cairns v. Bethea, 101 So. 587 (Ala. 1924) 2
Campbell v. Crawford, 63 Ala. 392 (1879) 15
Wooten v. Steele, 109 Ala. 563 (1895) 14
Leyden v. Calhoun Co-Op. Creamery Co., 135 So. 317 (Ala. 1931) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list