TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

De Bardeleben v. State

De Bardeleben v. State.

De Bardeleben v. State, 78 So. 877 (Ala. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 4, 1918
Docket
No. 5 Div. 700.
Judges
Sayre, Anderson, McClellan, Gardner
Citations
78 So. 877201 Ala. 5231918 Ala. LEXIS 107
Disposition
Certiorari denied.
Summary
Certiorari to' Court of Appeals. E. L. De Bardeleben was convicted of burning an insured house with the intent to defraud the insurer. From a judgment of the Court of Appeals (77 South. 979), reversing and remanding, he applies for writ of certiorari.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sayre

SAYRE, J.

This court is satisfied that the Court of Appeals has reached a correct conclusion on the two points brought into question by the application in this ease (De Bardeleben v. State, 77 South. 979 ), namely: (1) The admissibility of the testimony of the defendant’s wife; and (2) the admissibility of the entry made by the clerk of the circuit court going to show the quashal of a previous indictment and an order that another be preferred. In a proper proceeding and upon competent evidence the minutes of the court may yet be amended to show the judgment of the court in that matter, as the Court of Appeals has indicated.

Certiorari denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1918: 11933: 11941: 11973: 11976: 11977: 11982: 21986: 11988: 11993: 11998: 119182026peak 1982 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Morton v. State338 So. 2d 423 (Ala. Crim. App. 1976)
  2. Arnold v. State353 So. 2d 524 (Ala. 1977)
  3. Kilpatrick v. State285 So. 2d 516 (Ala. Crim. App. 1973)
  4. Ziglar v. State629 So. 2d 43 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)
  5. Ingle v. State415 So. 2d 1225 (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
  6. Moore v. State539 So. 2d 416 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Radford v. State726 So. 2d 756 (Ala. Crim. App. 1998)
  2. Ziglar v. State629 So. 2d 43 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)
  3. Moore v. State539 So. 2d 416 (Ala. Crim. App. 1988)
  4. Bright v. State485 So. 2d 398 (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
  5. Ingle v. State415 So. 2d 1225 (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
  6. Hollingsworth v. State411 So. 2d 858 (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
De Bardeleben v. State, 77 So. 979 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list