De Bardeleben v. State
De Bardeleben v. State.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
SAYRE, J.
This court is satisfied that the Court of Appeals has reached a correct conclusion on the two points brought into question by the application in this ease (De Bardeleben v. State, 77 South. 979 ), namely: (1) The admissibility of the testimony of the defendant’s wife; and (2) the admissibility of the entry made by the clerk of the circuit court going to show the quashal of a previous indictment and an order that another be preferred. In a proper proceeding and upon competent evidence the minutes of the court may yet be amended to show the judgment of the court in that matter, as the Court of Appeals has indicated.
Certiorari denied.
ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.