Foxx v. State
Foxx v. State.
Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge.
The jury’s verdict found appellant guilty under the first count of the indictment, which action operated as an acquittal of him under the second. There were but two counts in the indictment.
The first was in Code form for an offense under Code 1923, § 4131. Demurrers to it were properly overruled. Code 1923, § 4556, form 58.
If the inclusion of the second count, with the first, constituted a misjoinder of offenses rendering the indictment subject to the demurrers interposed on that ground, the action of the jury above noted caused any error in overruling said demurrers to be without injury to appellant.
The appeal is on the record proper, without bill of exceptions, and we can find no prejudicial error to have been committed.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.