TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mims v. State

Mims v. State.

Mims v. State, 84 So. 394 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 16, 1919
Docket
No. 5 Div. 302.
Judges
Samford
Citations
84 So. 39417 Ala. App. 2761919 Ala. App. LEXIS 250
Disposition
Reversed and remanded.
Cited by 4
Headnotes
Criminal Law For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
Summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; Leon McCord, Judge. Mann Mims was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and lie appeals. Counsel discussed the assignments of error, but without reference to the points cited in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Samford

SAMFORD, J.

The affidavit was made before the probate judge, and warrant was issued and made returnable to the county court. There was no judgment in the county court, no appeal bond, no demand for a jury; in fact, nothing appears in the record to give the circuit court jurisdiction. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167 , 59 South. 325 .

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1922: 11923: 21930: 119222026peak 1923 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hall v. State95 So. 904 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923)
  2. Courson v. State93 So. 223 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)
  3. Parrish v. State129 So. 312 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930)
  4. Upshaw v. State96 So. 376 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Parrish v. State129 So. 312 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930)
  2. Upshaw v. State96 So. 376 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923)
  3. Hall v. State95 So. 904 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923)
  4. Courson v. State93 So. 223 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Haynes v. State, 59 So. 325 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list