Baldwin Cooke Company v. Keith Clark, Inc.
BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KEITH CLARK, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Baldwin Cooke Co. v. Keith Clark, Inc., 505 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir. 1974)
Opinion
*1251 PER CURIAM.
Defendant Keith Clark, Inc. appeals from a District Court judgment and decree enjoining defendant from infringing plaintiff Baldwin Cooke Company’s copyrights on its “Executive Planner.” We affirm the judgment and decree of the District Court and adopt the opinion of that court, Baldwin Cooke Co. v. Keith Clark, Inc., 383 F.Supp. 650 (N.D.Ill.1974).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Cooling Systems and Flexibles, Inc., a California Corporation v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-Western, Inc.
- Apple Barrel Productions, Inc. v. Beard
- Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.
- Baldwin Cooke Co. v. Keith Clark, Inc.
- Schroeder v. William Morrow & Co.
- Ropat Corp. v. Scovill Manufacturing Company
Most recent
- Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.
- Cooling Systems and Flexibles, Inc., a California Corporation v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-Western, Inc.
- Apple Barrel Productions, Inc. v. Beard
- Baldwin Cooke Co. v. Keith Clark, Inc.
- Schroeder v. William Morrow & Co.
- Ropat Corp. v. Scovill Manufacturing Company
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.