In re Countryman
In Re J. H. Countryman.
Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, Justice.
Affirmed on authority of Ex parte Von L. Thompson, post, p. 113, 152 So. 229 .
All the Justices concur.
THOMAS, J., having stated the nature and extent of his dissent in Ex parte Thompson and in Re Fite, ante, p. 4, 152 So. 229, 246 , concurs in the foregoing.
Addendum
On Rehearing.
PER CURIAM.
Upon further consideration of this cause, the court is of the opinion that a sentence of suspension of the appellant from the practice of the law for eighteen months from October 12, 1933, is an adequate penalty to be imposed in this case. It will be, and is so ordered.
The judgment of the bar commission is, therefore, modified so as to suspend and restrain the appellant from the practice of the law, as above indicated, and for the time stated.
Judgment modified; application for rehearing overruled.
All the Justices concur.
Addendum
On Application for Rehearing by State Bar Commission.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in this case is modified in accordance with the opinion of this court in Re Von L. Thompson, post, p. 113, 152 So. 229 , rendered on consideration of the application for rehearing by the state bar commission.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.