TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Nunnley

Ex Parte Frank Nunnley.

Ex Parte Nunnley, 106 So. 203 (Ala. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 12, 1925
Docket
No. 8 Div. 822.
Judges
Anderson, Sayre, Gardner, Mibeer
Citations
106 So. 203213 Ala. 6911925 Ala. LEXIS 495

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Frank Nunnley for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Nunnley v. State, 106 So. 203 .

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and MIBEER, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • ("We cannot understand why the defendant should complain at the verdict finding him guilty of a misdemeanor only, for in our opinion there was ample evidence to warrant his conviction under either or both [felony] counts of the indictment.")
1989: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. State552 So. 2d 883 (Ala. Crim. App. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Johnson v. State552 So. 2d 883 (Ala. Crim. App. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nunnley v. State, 106 So. 203 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list