TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Watts v. State

Troy Watts v. State.

Watts v. State, 109 So. 762 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Alabama Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 8, 1926
Docket
No. 6 Div. 997.
Judges
Samford
Citations
109 So. 76221 Ala. App. 5161926 Ala. App. LEXIS 264

Opinion of the Court — Samford

*517 SAMFORD, J.

The only question presented by this record is as to whether the county court of Tuscaloosa county was abolished upon the adoption of section 3800 of the Code of 1923, and it is conceded that this question has been passed upon by this court in Taylor v. State, 105 So. 915 .

1

We adhere to the ruling in the Taylor Case, supra, and upon authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 157.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 11940: 11968: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. King v. Uhlmann437 P.2d 928 (Ariz. 1968)
  2. Simms v. O. L. Crigler Co.47 S.W.2d 686 (Tex. App. 1931)
  3. Noojin v. State196 So. 750 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940)

Most recent

  1. King v. Uhlmann437 P.2d 928 (Ariz. 1968)
  2. Noojin v. State196 So. 750 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940)
  3. Simms v. O. L. Crigler Co.47 S.W.2d 686 (Tex. App. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Taylor v. State, 105 So. 915 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list