TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Denson

Ex Parte Denson.

Ex Parte Denson, 178 So. 434 (Ala. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 4, 1937
Docket
No. 6 Div. 47.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
178 So. 434235 Ala. 3131937 Ala. LEXIS 369

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM..

This cause comes before this court by petition of W. A. Denson pursuant to section 6225 of the Code of Alabama, as amended by Gen.Aets 1931, p. 285, for the purpose of reviewing disbarment proceed *314 ing-s by the Board of Commissioners of the State Bar of Alabama.

The grievance committee of the Birmingham Bar Association instituted disbarment proceedings before the Board of Commissioners charging said W. A. Den-son with professional misconduct in violation of specified State Bar Rules duly promulgated and approved by this court, whose violation constitutes lawful grounds for the disbarment of an attorney at law.

The hearing before the Board of Commissioners was had upon testimony theretofore taken before a committee of said board, with additional items presented at the hearing, and upon said hearing the Board of Commissioners found said W. A. Denson guilty as charged, and thereupon ordered and adjudged that he be disbarred and excluded from the practice of law.

The cause was duly argued and submitted in this court upon the entire record, including type written testimony taken before the committee of the board, volumes 1 to 8, and proceedings before the Board of Commissioners, volume 9, all containing 1,956 pages.

In reviewing such proceedings, this court is in the exercise of its original and inherent powers in the matter of disbarment of attorneys at law. Ex parte Thompson, 228 Ala. 113 , 152 So. 229 , 107 A.'L.R. 671.

Upon full consideration of the entire record, without presumption in favor of the finding of Board of Commissioners, this court is fully convinced that said W. A. Denson is guilty as charged; that his course of professional misconduct renders said W. A. Denson an unfit person to further engage in the practice of law. No specific or separate finding is deemed necessary.

An order and judgment of this court will be here entered revoking the license of said W. A. Denson as an attorney at law, striking his name frotn the role of attorneys of this court, and disbarring and excluding him from the further practice of law in this state.

The prayer of the petition to annul and vacate the judgment of the Board of Commissioners of the State Bar is denied.

The motions filed, on the submission of the cause to quash and to dismiss the proceedings upon grounds therein set forth are, separately and severally, denied and overruled.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1943: 11969: 21970: 119432026peak 1969 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ex Parte Grace13 So. 2d 178 (Ala. 1943)
  2. Ex Parte Alabama State Bar230 So. 2d 519 (Ala. 1970)
  3. Sullivan v. Alabama State Bar295 F. Supp. 1216 (M.D. Ala. 1969)
  4. Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar225 So. 2d 829 (Ala. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Ex Parte Alabama State Bar230 So. 2d 519 (Ala. 1970)
  2. Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar225 So. 2d 829 (Ala. 1969)
  3. Sullivan v. Alabama State Bar295 F. Supp. 1216 (M.D. Ala. 1969)
  4. Ex Parte Grace13 So. 2d 178 (Ala. 1943)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Thompson, 152 So. 229 (Ala. 1933) 61

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list