TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex Parte Cowin

Ex Parte Cowin.

Ex Parte Cowin, 179 So. 194 (Ala. 1938)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 10, 1938
Docket
No. 6 Div. 260.
Judges
Anderson, Brown, Knight, Thomas
Citations
179 So. 194235 Ala. 3291938 Ala. LEXIS 39

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Cowin, seeks by mandamus a review and revision of'the action of the respondent judge in the modification of the report of the register as to the allowance to the wife and children of the petitioner pendente lite in the divorce proceedings wherein the wife is complainant and the petitioner is respondent.

The change or modification was in an increase of $50, that is, from $110 to $160 per month for the wife and the two minor sons. The amount to be allowed is a matter which rests largely within the discretion of the/trial court. Ex parte Watson, 220 Ala. 409 , 125 So. 669 .

Therefore, irrespective of any difference in the finding of facts between the court and the register as to the wealth or income of the parties respectively, we are not prepared to hold that the amount allowed was unreasonable or improper.

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ. concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Watson, 125 So. 669 (Ala. 1930) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list