TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jones v. Polk

JONES Et Al. v. POLK

Jones v. Polk, 94 So. 350 (Ala. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 2, 1922
Docket
No. 3 Div. 559.
Judges
Anderson, McCLELLAN, Somerville, Thomas
Citations
94 So. 350208 Ala. 3771922 Ala. LEXIS 510

Opinion of the Court — Somerville

SOMERVILLE, J.

The appeal is from a decree of the probate court of Escambia county on the final settlement of an administration. The court allowed a claim in favor of the administrator for services rendered to his intestate during his lifetime, and this is the only part of the decree sought to be reviewed and corrected by this appeal.

The record wholly fails to show that any objection was made or exception taken to the allowance of this item of the account at the time of the rendition of the decree. Under the settled rule of this court we cannot, in that state of the record, review the matter complained of. Russell v. McPherson, 202 Ala. 310 , 80 South. 392 ; Morris v. Morris, 202 Ala. 457 , 80 South. 841 .

The record presenting no other question, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Russell v. McPherson, 80 So. 392 (Ala. 1918) 3
Morris v. Morris, 80 So. 841 (Ala. 1919) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list