Smith v. State
Smith v. State.
Smith v. State, 133 So. 741 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931)
Opinion of the Court
SAMFORD, J.
The evidence was in conflict, making a jury question as to the guilt vel non of the defendant. The affirmative charge was properly refused.
Defendant’s refused charge, which for convenience we have marked 3, is invasive of the province of the jury.
*242 Refused charge 4 is covered by the general charge.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.