TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Russellville v. Citizens' Bank & Savings Co.

CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE v. CITIZENS’ BANK & SAVINGS CO. Et Al.

City of Russellville v. Citizens' Bank & Sav. Co., 92 So. 469 (Ala. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 20, 1922
Docket
No. 8 Div. 449.
Judges
Sayre, Anderson, Gardner, Miller
Citations
92 So. 469207 Ala. 3481922 Ala. LEXIS 66

Opinion of the Court — Sayre

*349 SAYRE, J.' Appellees were prosecuted in the recorder’s court of the city of Russell-ville for failing, after notice, to pay a certain tax levied by the municipal authorities under an ordinance providing for the disposition of trash, .garbage, and night soil. To provide for the expenses of collection and removal, a special graduated tax is imposed upon all persons, firms, and corporations within the limits of the city. On appeal the circuit court seems to have ruled that the ordinance was without. the power of the municipal authorities.

We are loath to decide a question of this moment upon the meager arguments presented. However, the general principle is that every municipal corporation which demands taxes from the people, must be able to show dire authority from the state to make the demand. 2 Cooley, Taxation, 1293. And no authority to tax for special and unusual purposes can be inferred from a general grant. 1 Cooley, Taxation, 469. We are referred to section 1282 of the Code, among others less relevant, as authority for the tax here at issue. But that section provides for the establishment and maintenance of crematories and the haulage to them of trash and garbage. The city of Russellville maintains no crematories. We therefore are of opinion that the circuit court was right in its judgment. We will not, of course, be understood as doubting for a moment the power and duty of municipal corporations under the Code to maintain the health and cleanliness of their territories, and to that end provide proper ordinances. The question here relates only to the source from which such regulations may be financed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 119792026peak 1979 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Martin v. City of Trussville376 So. 2d 1089 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Martin v. City of Trussville376 So. 2d 1089 (Ala. Civ. App. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list