TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jordan v. Holliday

JORDAN Et Al. v. HOLLIDAY

Jordan v. Holliday, 129 So. 37 (Ala. 1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 29, 1930
Docket
No. 6 Div. 597.
Judges
Sayre, Anderson, Thomas, Brown
Citations
129 So. 37129 So. 87221 Ala. 4661930 Ala. LEXIS 305

Opinion of the Court — Sayre

SAYRE, X Statutory action of ejectment by appellee against appellants. Plaintiff claimed title as purchaser under a mortgage sale made by himself as assignee of the mortgage. Defendants traced title to the mortgagors. The result was made to turn upon the 'question -Whether the debt secured by the mortgage had been paid before the foreclosure. The foreclosure was had on January 3, 1929. The mortgage through which plaintiff claimed had been transferred by W. W. Ogden, the mortgagee, to plaintiff by the following indorsemént: “Transferred to J. M. Holliday for $827.45, 6/21/19. W. W. Ogden — J.” And immediately-thereunder was the following: “Mortgage executed by J. P. Henderson and wife for $1850.00, recorded in Mortgage Record 66 p. 284 Lamar County, Ala. is satisfied in full. This 26th day of June, 1919. W. W. Ogden, Mortgagee, J.” This, it will be observed, was dated after the transfer by Ogden to appellee. Further, one of defendants testified that at one time-he had a receipt from plaintiff for the amount of the mortgage due the latter as transferee. But this was explained by plaintiff as having been a part of the transaction by which defendants got a deed from the Hendersons, mortgagors, and to aid defendants therein with the expectation that -they would in some form make good; but that arrangement was not consummated, as defendant witness conceded. The other defendant did not testify.

The court was on these facts authorized to deal with the case as one depending upon undisputed facts, and gave the general charge for plaintiff without thereby unjustly affecting any right of defendants.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ„ concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list