Childs v. City of Birmingham
Childs v. City of Birmingham.
Opinion of the Court
BRICKEtN, P. J.
The proceeding against this defendant originated in the recorder’s court and was instituted by the city of Birmingham against her for the violation of a municipal ordinance; the specific charge being a violation of the prohibition laws of the city.
From a judgment of conviction in the recorder’s court, she appealed to the circuit court of Jefferson county, was again convicted in that court, and appeals here.
In this court nothing has been done by or on behalf of appellant in support of her appeal.
The statute (Code 1907, § 6264) dispenses with the necessity of an assignment of errors in a criminal cash only. Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199 , 23 South. 42 .
A prosecution for a violation of a municipal 'ordinance is statutory, and quasi criminal in its nature, and is not a criminal case covered by the provisions of chapter 162 of the Code relating to appeals and writs of error in such cases. Camden v. Bloch, 65 Ala. 236 .
Because of the failure of appellant to assign errors, the judgment appealed from, on motion of appellee, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.