TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gardner v. State

Gardner v. State.

Gardner v. State, 87 So. 888 (Ala. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 25, 1920
Docket
No. 8 Div. 304.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
87 So. 888205 Ala. 601920 Ala. LEXIS 356
Cited by 17
Summary
Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Petition by Joe Gardner for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise a judgment of said court (87 South. 885 1) rendered on the appeal of petitioner against the State. Writ denied.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Joe Gardner for certiorari to court of appeals to review and revise the judgment of said court rendered on the appeal of Joe Gardner against the state.

Writ denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1921: 11925: 11927: 11940: 11949: 11961: 11964: 11978: 11984: 11986: 11994: 11997: 11998: 11999: 12005: 12010: 12014: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Williams v. State451 So. 2d 411 (Ala. Crim. App. 1984)
  2. McColston v. State104 So. 347 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
  3. Vincent v. State113 So. 643 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927)
  4. Price v. State725 So. 2d 1003 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997)
  5. Wilkins v. State197 So. 75 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940)
  6. McWhorter v. State781 So. 2d 257 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)

Most recent

  1. Johnson v. State256 So. 3d 684 (Ala. Crim. App. 2014)
  2. Brown v. State74 So. 3d 984 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010)
  3. McGowan v. State990 So. 2d 931 (Ala. Crim. App. 2005)
  4. McWhorter v. State781 So. 2d 257 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
  5. Hagood v. State777 So. 2d 162 (Ala. Crim. App. 1998)
  6. Price v. State725 So. 2d 1003 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list