TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Birmingham v. Odum, Bowers White

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM Et Al. v. ODUM, BOWERS & WHITE

City of Birmingham v. Odum, 172 So. 124 (Ala. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Alabama · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 14, 1937
Docket
No. 6 Div. 42.
Judges
Brown, Anderson, Thomas, Knight
Citations
172 So. 124233 Ala. 3741937 Ala. LEXIS 31

Opinion of the Court — Brown

BROWN, Justice.

The principles of law applicable to this, appeal are stated in City of Birmingham et al. v. Hood-McPherson Realty Company (Hood-McPherson. Furniture Company, Intervener) (Ala. Sup.) 172 So. 114 , 1

this day decided, arid necessitate an affirmance of the decree from which this appeal is prosecuted.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

1

Ante, p. 352.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. City of Louisville v. Louisville Automobile Club, Inc.160 S.W.2d 663 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942)

Most recent

  1. City of Louisville v. Louisville Automobile Club, Inc.160 S.W.2d 663 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
City of Birmingham v. Hood-Mcpherson Realty Co., 172 So. 114 (Ala. 1937) 32

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list