Brandon v. Garland
Brandon v. Garland.
Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, C. J.
This is a suit for the penalty for a failure to enter partial payments upon the margin of the record of. a mortgage as provided by section 4897 of the Code of 1907. This is a penal statute, and, as repeatedly held by this court, must be strictly construed. The request to enter on the margin of the record was “partial payments made to you, by means of my employment to you, of $196.-65 paid you in the year 1921 by work.” The trial court tried the case without a jury, and saw and heard the witnesses, and in effect found that the plaintiff had not paid on the mortgage the sum of $196.65 as specified in the request to satisfy. In fact, it is not seriously contended by appellant that this sum should have been entered upon the margin of the record, but he claims that the proof shows at least that he should have been credited with a smaller amount, to wit, $50. So the question arises, Was the request sufficient to require the defendant to enter any and all partial payments to which plaintiff was entitled upon the record, or did said notice or request call on him to do other than credit him with $196.65 paid in the year 1921 by work? Of course, generally speaking, the lesser is included in the greater; but here the notice specified a certain amount derived from a certain source, and was not a request to enter all partial payments or such as he was entitled to, and the entry of a lesser amount would not have complied with or conformed to the request which was specific and limited, and we do not think that the trial court erred in so holding.
The request or notice in the case of New South B. & L. Association v. Bowie, 121 Ala. 465 , 25 South. 844 , was unlike the one in hand. There the request was not only to satisfy in full but further called for the entry of “each and- every partial payment ma'de thereon by said A. G. Bowie.' * * * *151 In any event we demand tlie entry of partial payments to be made on the margin of the records.”
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. , Affirmed.
SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILDER, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.