Ex Parte Weil
Ex Parte Weil.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The application to the basic question presented by the petition for certiorari of the considerations and decision set forth in the opinion of Mayfield, J., on rehearing, in Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. T. E. Lovejoy, Adm’r, 78 South. 299 .
1
requires the conclusion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, affirming the judgment of Montgomery circuit-court, was laid in error. The writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals is granted and, consistent with the ruling of this court in the Lovejoy Case,- the order or judgment of affirmance entered by the Court of Appeals in the Weil Case is reversed and annulled..
Writ granted.
McClellan, mayfield, sayre, and THOMAS, JJ., concur. ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and GARDNER, JJ., dissent.
1
Ante, p. 337.
Dissent
GARDNER, J.
(dissenting). In the ease of Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Lovejoy, 78 South. 299 1
(present term), the writer has expressed his dissenting views. The holding of the "majority in that case is considered as also controlling the question here involved. The views of the writer therein expressed are here referred to as expressive of his dissenting views in the instant case, with special reference to the cases of Northwestern Life Ins. Co. v. McCue, 223 U. S. 234 , 32 Sup. Ct. 220, 56 L. Ed. 419 , 38 L. R. A. (N. S.) 57, and Burt v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 362 , 23 Sup. Ct. 139. 47 L. Ed. 216 , as being here more directly in’point.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.