TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Joseph C. Canizaro v. Kohlmeyer & Company

Joseph C. CANIZARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOHLMEYER & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Canizaro v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 512 F.2d 484 (5th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 2, 1975
Docket
No. 74-2014
Judges
Thornberry, Simpson, Roney
Citations
512 F.2d 4841975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14842

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Canizaro, brought suit in the Southern District of New York against a number of New York defendants for damages for claimed violations of Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, Title 15 U.S.C. § 777 (2), and 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5 promulgated pursuant to § 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Title 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and on various state law principles in connection with a purchase by Canizaro of certain securities in May 1970. A New Orleans, Louisiana based registered broker-dealer, Kohlmeyer & Company (Kohlmeyer), the appellee herein, served as Canizaro’s broker or seller in the actual consummation of the purchase, and was named as a defendant in addition to the New York defendants. Upon Kohlmeyer’s motion, the case against the appellee was severed and transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Following a full-scale trial on the merits, the district court found for the de *485 fendant-appellee on all counts 1

and entered the judgment appealed from. For reasons well stated by the trial court we agree that the plaintiff-appellant Cañizaro failed to prove a violation of either § 12(2) or of Rule 10b — 5, or to prove a case under applicable Louisiana law.

The judgment below was right, and is in all respects Affirmed.

1

. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the trial court are reported at 370 F.Supp. 282 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 21989: 11991: 119782026peak 1978 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Canizaro v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 370 F. Supp. 282 (E.D. La. 1974) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list