TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Labor Relations Board v. C & W Lektra Bat Co.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. C & W LEKTRA BAT CO., Respondent

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & W Lektra Bat Co., 513 F.2d 200 (6th Cir. 1975)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 26, 1975
Docket
No. 74-1600
Judges
Phillips, Edwards, Hermansdorfer
Citations
513 F.2d 20089 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 27661975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15480

Opinion

ORDER This case is before the court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order issued against C & W Lektra Bat Company on April 3, 1974.

During negotiations for a collective bargaining agreement the Company insisted on a one year contract, while the Union insisted on a three year contract. The Union further stated that, in accordance with its policy, the contract would be submitted to the members for ratification. The Company met the three year demand, thus satisfying all items of mandatory bargaining. The Union decided against submitting the agreement to its members, but the Company refused to execute the agreement unless and until the Union complied with its original plan to submit the plan for ratification.

The Board held that the Company violated § 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(1) and (5), by refusing to execute the collective bargaining agreement. 209 N.L.R.B. No. 165, (April 3, 1974).

Upon consideration, the court concludes that the order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and that enforcement is required by the decisions of this court in Houchens Market of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 375 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1967) and N. L. R. B. v. Big Run Coal & Clay Co., 385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 824 , 89 S.Ct. 83 , 21 L.Ed.2d 95 (1968).

Accordingly, it is ordered that enforcement be granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11981: 11996: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Houchens Mkt. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 375 F.2d 208 (6th Cir. 1967) 27
Nat'l Lavor Relations Bd. v. Big Run Coal & Clay Co., 385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list