Technitrol, Inc., and v. Ncr Corporation, and
Opinion
513 F.2d 1130
TECHNITROL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. NCR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 74-1904, 74-1905.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued Feb. 21, 1975. Decided April 18, 1975.
Theodore W. Anderson and William M. Wesley, Chicago, Ill., for NCR corp.
S. C. Yuter, New York City, for Technitrol.
Before CUMMINGS, PELL and TONE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
Plaintiff Technitrol, Inc. appeals from an order granting summary judgment, based upon laches, in favor of the defendant NCR Corporation. Defendant NCR Corporation cross-appeals from the same order, arguing that it should have been awarded attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 . Although the District Court did not finally adjudicate the claims against another defendant, the order is appealable because it included a determination and direction for the entry of judgment as to NCR pursuant to Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. We affirm the judgment of the District Court in all respects and adopt Parts I through IV of the memorandum opinion and order of that court, Technitrol, Inc. v. Memorex Corp., 376 F.Supp. 828 (N.D.Ill.1974), as the opinion of this court.
2
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.